reactjs - How to pass in children to parent <Route> component -


i'd define following structure on page:

enter image description here

where layout static , contains elements appear on every page, , render page content based on url.

to achieve i've defined approutes, layout, about , notfound , used react-router, v4:

approutes.js

export default class approutes extends react.component {       render ()     {         const supportshistory = 'pushstate' in window.history;         return (         <browserrouter forcerefresh={!supportshistory} history={hashhistory} onupdate={() => window.scrollto(0, 0)}>             <div>                 <route path='/' component={layout}>                     <route path='/about' component={about}/>                     <route path='*' component={pagenotfround}/>                 </route>             </div>         </browserrouter>);     }; };

layout.js

class navigationpane extends react.component {     render()     {         return (             <div>                 <navlink to="/">home</navlink>                 <navlink to="/about">about</navlink>             </div>         )     } }  export default class layout extends react.component {     render ()     {         return (         <div classname="app-container">             <header>                 <navigationpane/>             </header>             <div classname="app-content">                 {this.props.children}             </div>         </div>         );     } }

layout's header rendered, @ / or @ /about page content empty. if change 1 below pagenotfound rendered @ end, no matter path, while rest works expected, namely / renders layout, while /about renders about component.

<browserrouter forcerefresh={!supportshistory} history={hashhistory} onupdate={() => window.scrollto(0, 0)}>                 <div>                     <route path='/' component={layout}/>                     <route path='/about' component={about}/>                     <route path='*' component={pagenotfround}/>                 </div>             </browserrouter>

i checked in both cases this.props.children in layout undefined.

update tried out few things , figured that

 <layout>      <switch>          <route exact path='/' component={indexpage}/>          <route path='/about' component={about}/>          <route component={pagenotfround}/>       </switch>  </layout>

will basic scenario , understand why previous code did not work: in react-router v4 

<route to='/' component={layout}>        <route path='/about' component={about}/> </route>

is not valid. structure

<browserrouter>       <div>          <route path='/' component={layout}>          <route path='/about' component={about}/>          <route path='*' component={pagenotfround}/>       </div>  </browserrouter>

will keep matching routes until rules exhausted, / matched every time , * matched every time.

so use <layout> component wrap , create routes inside , ensure 1 path matched use <switch>.

this not wanted, because if add path /about/:user about component rendered. question still open.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

'hasOwnProperty' in javascript -

i use obj.hasownproperty judge whether object has property, when replaced obj[prop] !== undefined , not normal implementation, ask, why behind method can not use it? object.hasownproperty(prop); object[prop] !== undefined; obj[prop] !== undefined wrong 2 reasons: you can explicitly set property undefined , obj[prop] = undefined; . obj.hasownproperty(prop) return true in case. obj[prop] follow prototype chain, return property that's inherited. obj.hasownproperty(prop) returns true if property exists directly in object, returns false inherited properties.
Read more

How to understand 2 main() functions after using uftrace to profile the C++ program? -

i trying uftrace profile following simple c++ program: #include <iostream> class { public: a() {std::cout << "a created" << std::endl;} ~a() {std::cout << "a destroyed" << std::endl;} }; int main() { a; return 0; } the profile result this: # uftrace a.out created destroyed # duration tid function 2.026 [ 4828] | __cxa_atexit(); [ 4828] | main() { [ 4828] | __static_initialization_and_destruction_0() { 89.397 [ 4828] | std::ios_base::init::init(); 0.768 [ 4828] | __cxa_atexit(); 93.029 [ 4828] | } /* __static_initialization_and_destruction_0 */ 94.425 [ 4828] | } /* main */ [ 4828] | main() { [ 4828] | a::a() { 11.104 [ 4828] | std::operator <<(); 10.825 [ 4828] | std::basic_ostream::operator <<(); 24.514 [ 4828] | } /* a::a */ [ 4828] | a::~a() { 0.978 [ 4828] | ...
Read more

android - Unable to generate FCM token from dynamically instantiated Firebase -

our business logic requires instantiate firebase during runtime. fetch firebase credentials (app id, api key etc.) default firebase location after knowing user's public key , create firebase instance using credentials. this means there 2 firebase instances used within app: the default "index" firebase gives credentials second the actual firebase intend use point forward the second firebase initialised this: firebaseapp app = firebaseapp.initializeapp(<context>, <options>, <app_label>); our problem traditional method of retrieving fcm token using firebaseinstanceidservice , ontokenrefresh() fails since ontokenrefresh() method called first firebase instance. directly calling string token = firebaseinstanceid.getinstance(app).gettoken(); returns null never ready when called. have tried polling test if token generated @ point. no luck. how can generate fcm token reliably firebase instance instantiated during runtime? i...
Read more