objective c - What is the purpose of declaring a protocol for a variable? -


i have been reading protocols on objective-c cannot grasp this:

consider line

person <coordinatesupport> *person = [[person alloc] init];

what purpose of declaring variable conform protocol coordinatesupport? compile time, xcode can warn me if assign different person or there purpose @ run time?

i cannot see how variable can conform protocol. ok, class easy see, because can have protocol defining methods want class follow ivar?

i not seeing it.

the standard pattern when declaring variable conforms protocol give "any object" type, id. declaring variable both has specific type and conforms protocol typically redundant – i'll explain why later. now, let's talk variables of type id<p>, p protocol, , why they're useful. type should read "an instance of class conforms p."

to concretize discussion follows, let's define protocol:

@protocol adder - (nsinteger)add:(nsinteger)a to:(nsinteger)b; @end

i cannot see how variable can conform protocol.

this 1 easy. variable conforms objective-c protocol when represents instance of class implements of required methods in protocol. 

@interface abacus : nsobject <adder> @end  @implementation abacus - (nsinteger)add:(nsinteger)a to:(nsinteger)b { return + b; } - (nsinteger)beadcount { return 91; } @end

given abacus class, could, of course, create new abacus:

abacus *a = [[abacus alloc] init]; nslog(@"%ld", (long)[a add:5 to:6]);  // 11 nslog(@"%ld", (long)[a beadcount]);   // 91

but declare a of type id<adder. remember, means type of a "an instance of class conforms adder."

id<adder> = [[abacus alloc] init]; nslog(@"%ld", (long)[a add:5 to:6]);  // 11 nslog(@"%ld", (long)[a beadcount]);   // compile error: no known instance method selector 'beadcount'

the compiler complains because said type of a is class conforms adder, , in adder protocol method named beadcount.

what purpose of declaring variable conform [a protocol]?

the purpose information hiding. when want class conforms adder, don't need care actual class – you id<adder>. imagine abacus system class, , you've written following code:

- (abacus *)getadder { return [[abacus alloc] init]; } - (void)dowork {     abacus *a = [self getadder];     // lots of adding... }

then, in ios 42, apple comes new innovation – the calculator class! friends tell calculator adds 2 numbers more twice fast abacus, , cool kids using it! decide refactor code, realize not have change return type of getadder, types of variables assign return value of getadder! lame. if had done instead:

- (id<adder>)getadder { return [[abacus alloc] init]; } - (void)dowork {     id<adder> *a = [self getadder];     // lots of adding... }

now, when want migrate calculator, need change body of getadder return [[calculator alloc] init] , you're done! 1 line. rest of code stays same. in case, have hidden true type of instance returned getadder rest of code. information hiding makes refactoring easier.

lastly, promised explain why abacus <adder> *a = ... redundant. you're saying here "a instance of abacus conforms adder." (and compiler) know abacus conforms adder – it's right there in interface declaration! rmaddy points out, there cases want talk instance either given class, or subclass thereof, , specify conforms protocol, situations rare, , specifying both class , protocol conformance unneeded.

for more information, check out apple's working protcols guide.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

'hasOwnProperty' in javascript -

i use obj.hasownproperty judge whether object has property, when replaced obj[prop] !== undefined , not normal implementation, ask, why behind method can not use it? object.hasownproperty(prop); object[prop] !== undefined; obj[prop] !== undefined wrong 2 reasons: you can explicitly set property undefined , obj[prop] = undefined; . obj.hasownproperty(prop) return true in case. obj[prop] follow prototype chain, return property that's inherited. obj.hasownproperty(prop) returns true if property exists directly in object, returns false inherited properties.
Read more

How to put a lock and transaction on table using spring 4 or above using jdbcTemplate and annotations like @Transactional? -

i trying put lock on table while writing on table , if happened in between roll-back . trying convert below code lock table test_g1 read; lock table test_g write; -- begin; start transaction; insert test_g1 values(143); insert test_g values(145); select * test_g1; select * test_g; rollback; select * test_g; unlock tables; how convert above code @transactional spring jdbctemplate code? @transactional(rollbackfor={dataaccessexception.class}) public void test(){ jdbctemplate.execute("insert test1 (id, nam) values (4, 'a')"); throw new dataaccessexception("error") { }; } here trying throw error, insert statement should rollback it's not happening . thanks edit-1 attaching code , doing in jdbcdaoimpl.java , mentioned problem comment above test() . app.java package com.cgiri.javabrains.spring4; import org.springframework.beans.factory.annotation.autowired; import org.springframework.context.applic...
Read more

How to understand 2 main() functions after using uftrace to profile the C++ program? -

i trying uftrace profile following simple c++ program: #include <iostream> class { public: a() {std::cout << "a created" << std::endl;} ~a() {std::cout << "a destroyed" << std::endl;} }; int main() { a; return 0; } the profile result this: # uftrace a.out created destroyed # duration tid function 2.026 [ 4828] | __cxa_atexit(); [ 4828] | main() { [ 4828] | __static_initialization_and_destruction_0() { 89.397 [ 4828] | std::ios_base::init::init(); 0.768 [ 4828] | __cxa_atexit(); 93.029 [ 4828] | } /* __static_initialization_and_destruction_0 */ 94.425 [ 4828] | } /* main */ [ 4828] | main() { [ 4828] | a::a() { 11.104 [ 4828] | std::operator <<(); 10.825 [ 4828] | std::basic_ostream::operator <<(); 24.514 [ 4828] | } /* a::a */ [ 4828] | a::~a() { 0.978 [ 4828] | ...
Read more