sql server: access remotely vs locally -
i have sql server database instance running in 1 location (let's new york). have process writes database located in same region. exposes api accessed process running in remote location (let's london).
the question better setup?
a) setup shown above.
b) remote process directly writing database.
also, option (b) hold onto db connections longer or sql server api smart enough block db after data has transferred on wire? i.e. there higher chance of running max connections option (b)?
Comments
Post a Comment